HIGH COURT PERMISSION EXAM. CIVIL DRAFTING – 04. (Revision)

হাইকোর্ট পারমিশন লিখিত পরীক্ষা প্রস্তুতি

Civil-Question No-04 (Civil Part):

‘A’ instituted a suit against ‘B’ in the Court of Assistant Judge, Sylhet for a decree of perpetual injunction simpliciter with reference to certain property. Anyway, ‘B’ filed an application for local investigation of the suit-property and that was allowed by the Assistant Judge. ‘A’ being aggrieved by the aforesaid order moved the District Judge of Sylhet who also affirmed the order of the Assistant Judge. Advise ‘Al as to the next course of action and prepare a brief as per provisions of the relevant law in this regard. (25th June 2010, 15th July 2011, 15th March 2013, 9th January, 2016, 2017).

(প্রশ্নটি বাংলায় (দেওয়ানী)ঃ ‘ক’ সিলেটের ১ম সহকারী জজ আদালতে খি’ এর বিরুদ্ধে কিছু সুনির্দিষ্ট সম্পত্তির ব্যাপারে চিরস্থায়ী নিষেধাজ্ঞার ডিক্রী জারীর প্রার্থনায় একটি মামলা দায়ের করেন। খ’ নালিশা সম্পত্তির স্থানীয় তদন্তের জন্য একটি দরখাস্ত দায়ের করেন এবং বিজ্ঞ সহকারী জজ উহা মঞ্জুর করেন। ‘ক’ উপরোক্ত আদেশ দ্বারা সংক্ষুব্ধ, অসন্তুষ্ট হইয়া সিলেটের জেলা জজ আদালতে আবেদন করেন যিনি বিজ্ঞ সহকারী জজের আদেশ বহাল রাখেন। ‘ক’ কে তাহার গ্রহনীয় পদক্ষেপ সম্পর্কে পরামর্শ নাও এবং এই প্রসঙ্গে সংশ্লিষ্ট আইন মোতাবেক একটি ব্রীফ প্রস্তুত করুন (২৫শে জুন ২০১০, ১৫ই জুলাই ২০১১, ১৫ই মার্চ ২০১৩, ৯ই জানুয়ারী ২০১৬, ২০১৭)।

—————————

Answer to the Question No. 04 (Civil)

DISTRICT: SYLHET,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH

HIGH COURT DIVISION

(CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION)

CIVIL REVISION NO.         OF 2022

IN THE MATTER OF:

An application under Section 115(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure.

AND INTHE MATTER OF:

‘A’ Son of Md. Shaiful Islam

Of village/ of 66/6 Zindabazar, Police Station- Sylhet Sadar, District- Sylhet

—- Plaintiff-Petitioner.

-VERSUS-

‘B’ Son of Md. Milon Sarkar

Of village/of 55/5 Zindabazar, Police Station- Sylhet Sadar, District- Sylhet

………Defendant-Opposite Party.

AND

IN THE MATTER OF:

Judgment and Order dated 04.04.2020 passed in Civil Revision No. 323 of 2020 by the District Judge, Sylhet dismissing the revisional application of the plaintiff petitioner and affirming the judgment and order dated 07.07.2018 passed in Title Suit No. 123 of 2018 by the Assistant Judge, 1st Court, Sylhet allowing the application for local investigation of the defendant.  

APPLICATION VALUED AT TK. 3,00,00,000/-

SUIT VALUED AT TK. 3,00,00,000/-

TO-

Mr. Justice Hasan Foez Siddique, the Hon’ble Chief Justice of Bangladesh and his companion Hon’ble Justices of the said Hon’ble Court.

The humble petition on behalf of the petitioner most respectfully-

SHEWETH:

1. That ‘A’ the petitioner in the instant case is the lawful owner and possessor of the suit property which he got from his father along with other properties by way of inheritance on his death.

2. That ‘B’, the opposite party claims that he has purchased the suit property by a registered sale deed being sale deed No. 88443322 dated 05.05.2015 and since then he is in possession of the suit property.

3. That the petitioner as plaintiff instituted Title Suit No. 123 of 2018 in the Court of Assistant Judge, 1st Court, Sylhet for perpetual inj unction/permanent injunction against the defendant-opposite party.

4. That the defendant opposite party appeared before the trial Court and contested the suit by filing written statements denying the all material averments made in the plaint.

5. That the defendant opposite party has been claiming the suit property, by way of purchase from a co-sharer on the basis of a sale deed which has not been properly registered.

6. That the property has not yet been partitioned amongst the co- sharers by metes and bounds.

7. That due to unlawful claim of the defendant-opposite party over the case property a cloud has been cast upon the title of the petitioner’s case property.

8. That in order to remove the cloud, the petitioner as plaintiff filed Title Suit No. 123 of 2018 in the 1st court of Assistant Judge, Sylhet for declaration of title over the suit property described in the schedule of the plaint.

9. that the dependent opposite party on 02.02.2018 filed an application for local investigation and the plaintiff petitioner contested the same by filing an written objection denying the material averments made in the plaint.

10. That during trial of the suit the defendant ‘B’ filed an application for local investigation which was allowed by the learned court by its order dated 03.03.2018.

Certified copy of the said application and Order of the Court are annexed herewith and marked as ANNEXURE ‘A-1’ & ‘A’ respectively.

11. That being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 04.04.2020 passed by the District Judge, Dhaka in Civil Revision No. 323 of 2020, the plaintiff- petitioner begs to move this application under Section 115(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure on the following amongst other-

GROUNDS

  1. For that the learned District Judge, Sylhet committed error of law resulting to an error in decision in disallowing the appeal affirming the judgment and order of the trial court which occasioned failure of justice.
  2. For that the decision of the learned District Judge as well as the Assistant Judge committed an error of law resulting an error in decision in allowing the application for local investigation.
  3.  For that the decision of the learned District Judge as well as the Assistant Judge are based on no cogent reason or on any sound principle of law and as such the same are liable to be set aside.
  4. For that both the learned courts below committed an error of law in misconceiving and misconstruing the actual facts and circumstances of the case resulting to an error in decision occasioning failure of justice.

Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that your Lordships would graciously be pleased to call for the records and grant leave for Revision and issue a Rule on the defendant opposite party to show cause as to why the judgment and order dated 04.04.2020 passed in Civil Revision No. 323 of 2020 by the District Judge, Sylhet dismissing the revisional application of the plaintiff petitioner and affirming the judgment and order dated 07.07.2018 passed in Title Suit No. 123 of 2018 by the Assistant Judge, Lst Court, Sylhet allowing the application of the Defendant for local investigation should not be set aside, on perusal of the record and cause shown, if any and hearing the parties make the Rule absolute and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to your Lordships may deem fit and proper.

-AND-

Pending hearing of the Rule your Lordships kindly be pleased to pass an order for staying all further proceedings in Title Suit No. 123 of 2018 now pending in the Court of Assistant Judge, 1 Court, Sylhet.

And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray,

AFFIDAVIT

I, Mr. ‘A’, Son of Md. Shaiful Islam and Most. Amena Begum, of village/ of 66/6 Zindabazar, Police Station- Sylhet Sadar, District- Sylhet, aged about 45 years, by faith -Muslim, by occupation- Business, by Nationality Bangladeshi, National ID No. 555666777888, do hereby solemnly affirm and say as follows:-

1. That I am the petitioner and tadbirkar in this case and as such I am acquainted with the facts and circumstances of this case and competent to swear this Affidavit.

2. That the statements of facts made in this application are true to my knowledge and matters of record, which I verily believe to be true and the rests are submissions before this Hon’ble Court.

(Md. WXYWXYXYXY)

Advocate

Solemnly affirmed before me by the said deponent on this the 07th day of July, 2022 at 11 AM.

DEPONENT

The deponent is known to me and identified by me.

Md. XYXYXYXY

Advocate

Membership No.

Room No

COMMISSIONER OF AFFIDAVIT SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION, DHAKA

Related Posts

HIGH COURT PERMISSION EXAM. CRIMINAL DRAFTING -05. (APPEAL CASE)

Criminal-Question No-05 (Criminal Part): Insaf Ali was suffering from enlarged spleen. Abdul Latif hired the rickshaw pulled by Insaf Ali for going to Azimpur Colony from Kamlapur Railway station. Abdul…

HIGH COURT PERMISSION EXAM. CRIMINAL DRAFTING -04. (APPEAL CASE)

Post No- 137 হাইকোর্ট পারমিশন লিখিত পরীক্ষা প্রস্তুতি Criminal-Question No-04 (Criminal Part): Arfan was convicted by the Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Tribunal No. 1, Comilla by the impugned judgment and order…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Missed

HIGH COURT PERMISSION EXAM. CRIMINAL DRAFTING -05. (APPEAL CASE)

HIGH COURT PERMISSION EXAM. CRIMINAL DRAFTING -05. (APPEAL CASE)

HIGH COURT PERMISSION EXAM. CRIMINAL DRAFTING -04. (APPEAL CASE)

HIGH COURT PERMISSION EXAM. CRIMINAL DRAFTING -04. (APPEAL CASE)

HIGH COURT PERMISSION EXAM. CRIMINAL DRAFTING -03. (MISCELLANEOUS CASE)

HIGH COURT PERMISSION EXAM. CRIMINAL DRAFTING -03. (MISCELLANEOUS CASE)
Criminal-Question No-02 (Criminal Part) with Application for bail.

দেওয়ানী কার্যবিধি আইনের ৩৯ আদেশের ১/২নং রুলের বিধানমতে অস্থায়ী নিষেধাজ্ঞার প্রার্থনা। injunction.

  • By admin
  • April 1, 2024
  • 239 views
দেওয়ানী কার্যবিধি আইনের ৩৯ আদেশের ১/২নং রুলের বিধানমতে অস্থায়ী নিষেধাজ্ঞার প্রার্থনা। injunction.

বিবিধ আপিল এর আর্জির নমুনা। Drafting।

  • By admin
  • April 1, 2024
  • 174 views